Søk etter hoteller i Mitchell Shire

«Overall a wonderful stay on our families road trip. Room was spacious and comfortable. Great cafe for breakfast across the road. Would stay again.»

«Great Motel and staff»

«.»

«Yes, was very clean, and comfortable. Staff very courteous. »

«Pleasant polite service. Room upgrade. Amenities neat and tidy for our short stay»

«Easy transaction. Helpfull staff. Clean neat and tidy»

«We really enjoyed our stay at Maple Park. From the personal treating, to the welcome and breakfast platter, and the outdoor tub, it was such a beautiful stay and experience. Even our pup had a wonderful time! We would stay there again! »

«Lovely comfortable cottage. E Very thing included. Beautiful parklands on the riverbank»

«Ideal spot! Beautiful clean property»

«Unique location, was great to get away from the usual motel/hotel and out with nature!»

«Beautiful little cottage on stunning property. A couple of steps up to each one and the property is steep for anyone with mobility challenges like me but for my level of needs I made it work. I’m not sure if the spa would have been accessible as I didn’t make it up that high but I suspect it had a few more steps which may not have been achievable for myself. It was a beautiful spot and I’d love to stay there again! »

«The room was spotless and the staff very very friendly and informative. I would definitely stay there again if I'm in the area. Great experience thank you»

«Nice quiet location and a very spacious house. Will definately return again in the future.»

«I am rating this as Ok as the owner himself is very responsive and accomodating. Feedback and images of the state of the accomodation has been provided directly with the owner for them to take up and manage.several aspects of internal cleanliness were missed prior to our arrival and the cleaner confiming she was there earlier in the week and fobbing the uncleaniness to it being hard to keep a country property clean. I appreciate this given I too live in regional victoria, but the house was not ...